AI hiring research that shows where demand is moving, and why.
Recruiter researches hiring at the companies you choose, analyses role volume, skill mix and advertised pay against their own history, and synthesises a weekly picture of where demand is moving.
The problem
Staffing firms find new clients by noticing who has started hiring. In-house teams lose candidates to employers they did not know were competing. Both depend on someone scrolling careers pages, which does not scale past a handful of companies.
What arrives
- A hiring digest and demand alerts on volume or rate shifts
- Roles & rates: requisition volume against advertised pay
- Rate cards: what a role costs, from advertised ranges
- Competing employers: who else is hiring into your roles
- A skills map of what is asked for together
The agents on the job, in the order they work
01 · Recruiter
Reads Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable, SmartRecruiters and Recruitee boards for every company you watch.
02 · Historian
Reads the last ninety days first, so the picture starts with history rather than a blank page.
03 · Analyst
Writes the hiring digest: where demand moved and who moved it.
What it does not do
- It reads the six job boards above, not LinkedIn, and not any site whose terms forbid automated access.
- Pay is shown only where a posting states it.
The Talent lens, on every plan. Staffing firms selling into those accounts often add the Revenue lens on Growth.
What people ask
Can a staffing firm use this to find new clients?
Does it include candidate data?
How current is the data?
See it on your own market.
A working demo on the companies you actually care about, not a recorded video.